Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Clin Lab ; 69(1)2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2203266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Repeated re-positive of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.617.2 (Delta) variants of concern (VOC) in recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have not been reported yet. METHODS: We reported a rare case of repeated COVID-19 relapse during the post-discharge surveillance. RESULTS: This case had long-term viral shedding for 79 days. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights that longer observation and isolation periods need be considered for patients with SARS-CoV-2 delta VOC infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Chronic Disease
2.
Medicina clinica (English ed.) ; 158(10):458-465, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1888293

ABSTRACT

Background Few studies have investigated the impacts of metabolic syndrome (MS) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We described the clinical features and prognosis of confirmed COVID-19 patients with MS during hospitalization and after discharge. Methods Two hundred and thirty-three COVID-19 patients from the hospitals in 8 cities of Jiangsu, China were retrospectively included. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients were described and risk factors of severe illness were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results Forty-five (19.3%) of 233 COVID-19 patients had MS. The median age of COVID-19 patients with MS was significantly higher than non-MS patients (53.0 years vs. 46.0 years, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences of clinical symptoms, abnormal chest CT images, and treatment drugs between two groups. More patients with MS had severe illness (33.3% vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001) and critical illness (4.4% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.037) than non-MS patients. The proportions of respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in MS patients were also higher than non-MS patients during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis showed that concurrent MS (odds ratio [OR] 7.668, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.062–19.201, P < 0.001) and lymphopenia (OR 3.315, 95% CI 1.306–8.411, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of severe illness of COVID-19. At a median follow-up of 28 days after discharge, bilateral pneumonia was found in 95.2% of MS patients, while only 54.7% of non-MS patients presented bilateral pneumonia. Conclusions 19.3% of COVID-19 patients had MS in our study. COVID-19 patients with MS are more likely to develop severe complications and have worse prognosis. More attention should be paid to COVID-19 patients with MS.

3.
Med Clin (Engl Ed) ; 158(10): 458-465, 2022 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1885985

ABSTRACT

Background: Few studies have investigated the impacts of metabolic syndrome (MS) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We described the clinical features and prognosis of confirmed COVID-19 patients with MS during hospitalization and after discharge. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-three COVID-19 patients from the hospitals in 8 cities of Jiangsu, China were retrospectively included. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients were described and risk factors of severe illness were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results: Forty-five (19.3%) of 233 COVID-19 patients had MS. The median age of COVID-19 patients with MS was significantly higher than non-MS patients (53.0 years vs. 46.0 years, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences of clinical symptoms, abnormal chest CT images, and treatment drugs between two groups. More patients with MS had severe illness (33.3% vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001) and critical illness (4.4% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.037) than non-MS patients. The proportions of respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in MS patients were also higher than non-MS patients during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis showed that concurrent MS (odds ratio [OR] 7.668, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.062-19.201, P < 0.001) and lymphopenia (OR 3.315, 95% CI 1.306-8.411, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of severe illness of COVID-19. At a median follow-up of 28 days after discharge, bilateral pneumonia was found in 95.2% of MS patients, while only 54.7% of non-MS patients presented bilateral pneumonia. Conclusions: 19.3% of COVID-19 patients had MS in our study. COVID-19 patients with MS are more likely to develop severe complications and have worse prognosis. More attention should be paid to COVID-19 patients with MS.


Antecedentes: Pocos estudios han investigado el impacto del síndrome metabólico (SM) en la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Describimos las características clínicas y el pronóstico de los pacientes con COVID-19 confirmados con SM durante la hospitalización y después del alta. Métodos: Se incluyó de forma retrospectiva a 233 pacientes con COVID-19 de los hospitales de 8 ciudades de Jiangsu (China). Se describieron sus características clínicas y se analizaron los factores de riesgo de enfermedad grave mediante un análisis de regresión logística. Resultados: De los 233 pacientes, 45 (19,3%) tenían EM. La mediana de edad de estos pacientes con EM fue significativamente mayor que la de los pacientes sin él (53,0 años frente a 46,0 años; p = 0,004). No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a los síntomas clínicos, las imágenes de TC torácica anormales y los fármacos de tratamiento entre los 2 grupos. Hubo más pacientes con EM que tuvieron enfermedades graves (33,3% frente a 6,4%; p < 0,001) y críticas (4,4% frente a 0,5%; p = 0,037) que los pacientes sin EM. Las proporciones de insuficiencia respiratoria y síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda en los pacientes con EM también fueron mayores que en los pacientes sin EM durante la hospitalización. El análisis multivariante mostró que la EM concurrente (odds ratio [OR] 7,668; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 3,062-19,201; p < 0,001) y la linfopenia (OR 3,315; IC del 95%: 1,306-8,411; p = 0,012) eran factores de riesgo independientes de COVID-19 grave. En una mediana de seguimiento de 28 días tras el alta, se encontró neumonía bilateral en el 95,2% de los pacientes con EM, mientras que solo la presentaron el 54,7% de los pacientes sin EM. Conclusiones: El 19,3% de los pacientes con COVID-19 tenían EM en nuestro estudio. Los pacientes con COVID-19 y EM son más propensos a desarrollar complicaciones graves y tienen peor pronóstico. Se debe prestar más atención a los pacientes con COVID-19 y EM.

4.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 10(7): e664, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1885400

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emerging variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have resulted in new challenges for epidemic prevention and control worldwide. However, little is known about the latent period of coronavirus disease by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant of concern (VOC) in the postvaccination era. METHODS: The epidemiology and clinical data of cases with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC infection were retrospective collected. Dates of the first positive PCR test were collected to estimate the distribution of latent period. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, 16 were male (40%). The median age of patients was 47.5 years. The median latent period of patients was 6.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-9.0 days) and the longest latent period was 13.0 days after exposure. The latent periods were longer in male patients compared to female patients (median, 8.5 days vs. 5.0 days, p = .041). The median latent period was comparable among fully vaccinated cases (6.5 days), no vaccinated cases (7.5 days), and partially vaccinated cases (5.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: The median latent period of SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC infection was 6.0 days. The latent period between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients was not significantly different. The 14-day quarantine program is sufficient to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 by Delta VOC in the postvaccination era.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
5.
Virol J ; 18(1): 147, 2021 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1311250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical and virological course of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are lacking. We aimed to describe the clinical and virological characteristics of COVID-19 patients from 10 designated hospitals in 10 cities of Jiangsu province, China. The factors associated with the clearance of SARS-CoV-2 were investigated. METHODS: A total of 328 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively recruited. The epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, radiology and treatment data were collected. The associated factors of SARS-CoV-2 clearance were analyzed. RESULTS: The median duration of hospitalization was 16.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13.0-21.0 days). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.643, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.454-0.911, P = 0.013) was associated with the delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance, while the atomized inhalation of interferon α-2b could improve the clearance of SARS-CoV-2 (HR, 1.357, 95% CI 1.050-1.755, P = 0.020). Twenty-six (7.9%) patients developed respiratory failure and 4 (1.2%) patients developed ARDS. Twenty (6.1%) patients were admitted to the ICU, while no patient was deceased. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that age > 60 years was associated with the delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance, while treated with atomized inhalation of interferon α-2b could promote the clearance of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Duration of Therapy , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Virus Shedding , Young Adult
6.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 35(8): e23880, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is still little knowledge about the association of liver fibrosis with the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of the study was to determine the association of NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS)-determined liver fibrosis with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with NAFLD. METHODS: The NAFLD was diagnosed by the Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) in the absence of other causes of chronic liver diseases. NFS was used to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis. RESULTS: A total of 86 COVID-19 patients with NAFLD were included. The median age was 43.5 years, and 58.1% of patients were male. Thirty-eight (44.2%) patients had advanced liver fibrosis according to the NFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that concurrent diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 8.264, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.202-56.830, p = 0.032) and advanced liver fibrosis (OR 11.057, 95% CI 1.193-102.439, p = 0.034) were independent risk factors of severe illness in COVID-19 patients with NAFLD. CONCLUSION: NAFLD patients with NFS-determined advanced liver fibrosis are at higher risk of severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/etiology , Liver Cirrhosis/pathology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 158(10): 458-465, 2022 05 27.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1272618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the impacts of metabolic syndrome (MS) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We described the clinical features and prognosis of confirmed COVID-19 patients with MS during hospitalization and after discharge. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-three COVID-19 patients from the hospitals in 8 cities of Jiangsu, China were retrospectively included. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients were described and risk factors of severe illness were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five (19.3%) of 233 COVID-19 patients had MS. The median age of COVID-19 patients with MS was significantly higher than non-MS patients (53.0 years vs. 46.0 years, P=0.004). There were no significant differences of clinical symptoms, abnormal chest CT images, and treatment drugs between two groups. More patients with MS had severe illness (33.3% vs. 6.4%, P<0.001) and critical illness (4.4% vs. 0.5%, P=0.037) than non-MS patients. The proportions of respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in MS patients were also higher than non-MS patients during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis showed that concurrent MS (odds ratio [OR] 7.668, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.062-19.201, P<0.001) and lymphopenia (OR 3.315, 95% CI 1.306-8.411, P=0.012) were independent risk factors of severe illness of COVID-19. At a median follow-up of 28 days after discharge, bilateral pneumonia was found in 95.2% of MS patients, while only 54.7% of non-MS patients presented bilateral pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: 19.3% of COVID-19 patients had MS in our study. COVID-19 patients with MS are more likely to develop severe complications and have worse prognosis. More attention should be paid to COVID-19 patients with MS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Metabolic Syndrome , COVID-19/complications , China/epidemiology , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Chin J Acad Radiol ; 4(3): 160-168, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare quantifiable radiologic findings and their dynamic change throughout the clinical course of common and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to provide valuable evidence for radiologic classification of the two types of this disease. METHODS: 112 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Volumetric percentage of infection and density of the lung were measured by a computer-aided software. Clinical parameters were recorded to reflect disease progression. Baseline data and dynamic change were compared between two groups and a decision-tree algorithm was developed to determine the cut-off value for classification. RESULTS: 93 patients were finally included and were divided into common group (n = 76) and severe group (n = 17) based on current criteria. Compared with common patients, severe patients experienced shorter advanced stage, peak time and plateau, but longer absorption stage. The dynamic change of volume and density coincided with the clinical course. The interquartile range of volumetric percentage of the two groups were 1.0-7.2% and 11.4-31.2%, respectively. Baseline volumetric percentage of infection was significantly higher in severe group, and the cut-off value of it was 10.10%. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric percentage between severe and common patients was significantly different. Because serial CT scans are systemically performed in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, this quantitative analysis can simultaneously provide valuable information for physicians to evaluate their clinical course and classify common and severe patients accurately.

9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(8): e23996, 2021 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1119144

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: With the surge of newly diagnosed and severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the death toll is mounting, this study is aimed to explore the prognostic factors of severe COVID-19. This retrospective study included 122 inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 13 to February 25, 2020. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identity the risk factors, receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis was used for risk stratification. The baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR = 1.171, 95%CI = 1.049-1.306, P = .005) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR = 1.007, 95%CI = 1.002-1.011, P = .004) were identified as the independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 conditions, and the NLR-LDH grading system was developed to perform risk stratification. The baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR = 1.019, 95%CI = 1.004-1.306, P = .016) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (OR = 1.018, 95%CI = 1.004-1.035, P = .007) were identified as the independent predictors for disease progression of severe patients. Accordingly, The NLR-LDH grading system was a useful prognostic tool for the early detection of severe COVID-19. And in the severe patients, CRP and BNP seemed to be helpful for predicting the disease progression or death.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Neutrophils/metabolism , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors
10.
J Med Virol ; 93(6): 3305-3311, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-917094

ABSTRACT

We aimed to describe liver injury and identify the risk factors of liver injury in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients without chronic liver diseases (CLD). The clinical data of 228 confirmed COVID-19 patients without CLD were retrospectively collected from ten hospitals in Jiangsu, China. Sixty-seven (29.4%) of 228 patients without CLD showed abnormal liver function on admission, including increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (25 [11.0%]) U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 30 [13.2%]) U/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 28 [12.4%]) U/L, total bilirubin (Tbil) 16 [7.0%] µmol/L, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 10 [4.5%]) U/L. During hospitalization, 129 (56.3%) of 228 patients showed abnormal liver function, including elevated ALT (84 [36.8%]), AST (58 [25.4%]), GGT (67 [29.5%]), and Tbil (59 [25.9%]). Age over 50 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.086; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.030-4.225; p = .041), male sex (OR, 2.737; 95% CI, 1.418-5.284; p = .003), and lopinavir-ritonavir (OR, 2.504; 95% CI, 1.187-5.283; p = .016) were associated with higher risk of liver function abnormality, while the atomized inhalation of interferon α-2b (OR, 0.256; 95% CI 0.126-0.520; p < .001) was associated with reduced risk of liver function abnormality during hospitalization. Mild to moderate liver injury was common in COVID-19 patients in Jiangsu, China. Age over 50 years, male sex, and lopinavir-ritonavir were the independent risk factors of liver impairment in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Liver Diseases/virology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/pathology , Liver Function Tests , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ritonavir , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Viral Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Viral Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
11.
Int J Cardiol ; 326: 230-236, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-803390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia tends to affect cardiovascular system and cause cardiovascular damage. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of myocardial injury and risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and definite outcomes (discharge or death) were retrospectively analyzed. Laboratory results including myocardial biomarkers, oxygen saturation, inflammatory indicators and coagulation function were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model were used to explore risk factors for in-hospital mortality, and a chart with different combinations of risk factors was constructed to predict mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were included in the final analysis, consisting of 145 patients who recovered and 58 patients who died. Compared with survivors, non-survivors were older, with more comorbidities, more severe inflammation and active coagulation function, higher levels of myocardial biomarkers and lower SaO2. 28 (50%) non-survivors and 9 (6%) survivors developed myocardial injury, which was associated with disease severity at admission. Elevated d-dimer (OR = 9.51, 95% CI [3.61-25.0], P < 0.001), creatinine kinase-myocardial band (OR = 6.93, 95% CI [1.83-26.2], P = 0.004), Troponin I (OR = 10.1, 95% CI [3.1-32.8], P < 0.001) and C-reactive protein (OR = 15.1, 95% CI [1.7-129.3], P = 0.013) were risk factors for mortality. Patients with abnormal levels of d-dimer, Troponin I and CRP were predicted to have significantly higher probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection may induce myocardial injury and consequently exacerbate the clinical course and worsen prognosis. Abnormal d-dimer, CK-MB, Troponin I and CRP are risk factors for short-term mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Cardiomyopathies/blood , Cardiomyopathies/mortality , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , China/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 146(12): 3385-3388, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-734091

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tends to affect multiple organs and induce abnormal laboratory parameters. We designed this study to investigate the association between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elevation and SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received plasma CEA assays during hospitalization. Patients with other causes of CEA elevation were excluded. Data regarding epidemiological and demographical characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, and outcomes were analyzed. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between CEA levels and inflammation severity. RESULTS: 171 patients were included in the final study and 32 patients (18.7%) had raised serum of CEA (> 5 ng/ml), with a median (range) age of 66 (53-86). The median [interquartile range (IQR)] CEA level was 11.4 ng/ml (8.1-21.6), which was significantly higher than the upper limit of reference range. CEA level between 5-10 ng/ml was in 11 patients, 10-15 ng/ml in 10 patients, and > 15 ng/ml in 11 patients. No correlation was found between CEA levels and lymphocyte (R2 = 0.055; P = 0.10) nor CRP (R2 = 0.026; P = 0.38). The median levels of CEA were 20.0 ng/ml (IQR, 14.7-23.0) in non-survivors and 10.9 ng/ml (IQR 7.5-16.1) in survivors, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infection might be another cause of CEA elevation, with nearly 20% of patients experienced transient and marked CEA increment during COVID-19 pneumonia. The false-positive results of CEA elevation might have clinical significance for patients with colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia/blood , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia/complications , Pneumonia/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 8(4): 840-843, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-723382

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As an emerging infectious disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread throughout worldwide. Health care workers (HCWs) on frontline directly participated in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of COVID-19 patients are at high risk of getting infected with the highly infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. In Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, a total of 222 medical staff went to Wuhan city for support. In this study, we aimed to determine any nosocomial infection among our cohort of HCWs who worked in Wuhan. METHODS: Throat swab samples were obtained for RNA testing on day 1 and 14 of their quarantine upon their return to Nanjing. Radiological assessments were performed by chest computed tomography (CT) on day 14 of their quarantine. The blood was collected from 191 HCWs between May 12 and May 15. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibody responses were determined by a chemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: All the throat swab specimens were found negative for SARS-CoV-2. The radiological analysis revealed that there was no typical chest CT scan of COVID-19 among 222 HCWs. Consistently, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM or IgG was also found to be negative among 191 HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: There was no nosocomial infection of SARS-CoV-2 among our cohort of the frontline HCWs, suggesting that zero occupational infection is an achievable goal with appropriate training, strict compliance, and psychological support for the frontline HCWs.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/virology , Female , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pharynx/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
14.
Hypertens Res ; 43(8): 824-831, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-459258

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore the effect of hypertension on disease progression and prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 310 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were studied. A comparison was made between two groups of patients, those with hypertension and those without hypertension. Their demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratory indicators, and treatment methods were collected and analyzed. A total of 310 patients, including 113 patients with hypertension and 197 patients without hypertension, were included in the analysis. Compared with patients without hypertension, patients with hypertension were older, were more likely to have diabetes and cerebrovascular disease, and were more likely to be transferred to the intensive care unit. The neutrophil count and lactate dehydrogenase, fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels in hypertensive patients were significantly higher than those in nonhypertensive patients (P < 0.05). However, multivariate analysis (adjusted for age and sex) failed to show that hypertension was an independent risk factor for COVID-19 mortality or severity. COVID-19 patients with hypertension were more likely than patients without hypertension to have severe pneumonia, excessive inflammatory reactions, organ and tissue damage, and deterioration of the disease. Patients with hypertension should be given additional attention to prevent worsening of their condition.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hypertension/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL